Anna Hakobyan exposes Pashinyan's lies
- 7 days ago
- 2 min read

Various pro-government users are trying to present the announcement of the end of the relationship between Nikol Pashinyan and Anna Hakobyan as a personal drama. However, when it comes to the head of the country, the personal has long ceased to be just personal. Every word, every hint has political weight. And two thoughts voiced in this statement reveal the true face of the government, more clearly than any opposition speech.
First, the hint about law enforcement officers. The wording “They can come after me” is not a random statement. It is either a pre-calculated political message or an expression of sincere fear. In both cases, the conclusion is the same: even the closest people within the government do not rule out the possibility of political persecution. This is no longer an indicator of a family crisis, but of a crisis of the state system.
If the former wife of the head of the country publicly declares that she may become a target of law enforcement officers, then this indirectly confirms the suspicions that have been circulating in the public sphere for years: the law enforcement system is not independent and can serve political purposes. And if any process really begins tomorrow, in public perception it will be viewed not as a legal but as a political retribution. In this situation, the government finds itself in a dead end: take a step and prove once again that the law enforcement system is subservient to Pashinyan, or not take a step and their political PR campaign will remain incomplete.
The second was a blow to the “I love everyone” narrative. The public image built for years is based on speaking in the language of emotion, “love” and solidarity. However, Hakobyan’s simple statement that love should be proven with action, not words, actually destroys that propaganda layer from within. When such a contradiction is voiced within the same family, it becomes not a personal observation, but a political verdict.
It turns out that even if all this is viewed as a PR calculation or an attempt to change the public agenda, the result is the opposite. Public attention is focused not on the fact of the separation, but on the hints that have been made. And these hints strike at the very pillars on which the image of the current government is built: a legal state, love, solidarity, a new culture.
Thus, the family statement turned into a political self-confession. It showed that there is distrust within the government, there is talk of fear, there is a contradiction between words and actions. And no matter how much one tries to present it as a personal story, it has already settled in the public consciousness as a political fact. After all, political reality is often revealed not by opposition criticism, but by sincere sentences spoken from within. And in this case, it is precisely those words spoken from within that are the harshest assessment of the current government.




















