If we say that a soldier is a value for us, then he is a value not only in the military unit itself or in a military position, but also during his leisure hours. Abrahamyan

If we say that a serviceman is valuable to us, then he is valuable not only in the military unit or in combat positions, but also during his free time. Tigran Abrahamyan wrote about this.

“The Ministry of Defense, officially responding to the fact of yesterday’s death of a serviceman, stated that “no death has been recorded in the army,” adding that “the said incident occurred at the deceased’s place of residence, specifically, at a livestock farm.”

At the same time, the Ministry of Defense “clarified” that the deceased was not in service at that time, “the incident is not related to service and cannot be qualified as an accident that occurred in the army.”

In other words, the government continues to remain at the same point, in this case, in a quagmire.

I continue to insist that the government’s efforts are more directed towards various tricks, manipulations, and correcting other aspects of the issue than dealing with the main problem.

It is very likely that the main addressee of this message is not even the public, but directly Nikol Pashinyan, whom Papikyan is remotely convincing that the situation is not so hopeless, and that he is on the spot.

It is pointless to argue or convince the public: you are the ones primarily responsible for what has been created.

But, after all, a serviceman died. The first task is to find out why. Then, to understand its connection with the service in any way, including from the point of view of what work could have been done to prevent it, from moral and psychological to control.

After all, if we say that a serviceman is a value for us, then he is a value not only in the military unit itself or in combat positions, but also during his rest hours,” he noted.